Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - srkudai

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11
General topics / Re: Aksharamanamalai
« on: October 27, 2017, 11:19:33 AM »
Dear Ravi ji,
         :) I have a doubt here.

I am aware that Gayatri mantra, for example, has a certain chanting style that needs to be maintained. one cannot simply sing it.

But ... lets say someone does not "Feel" Devotion during simple chanting but feels it more during the singing by some singer ...

chanting in a certain way helps calm the mind. we can clearly see it by doing it. it needs no other proof.

Devotion also calms the mind.

Which should be given preference ?

Let me rephrase the question slightly different way...

suppose i go to a swami and ask for a mantra and he gives me gayatri ... and suppose i am a devotee of sri ramakrishna. simply saying ramakrishna uplifts me in devotion, but chanting gayatri also calms but is not of any devotional importance to me ...
just the name of sri ramakrishna is not a mantra in itself  in the traditional sense ...

should i chant the name of sri ramakrishna or gayatri which the swami gave me ? what is the way to decide ? pure devotion or proper chant ?? ofcourse a combination would be great ... but often times i may be devoted to a local deity for whom there is no chant as per shastras also ! :)


Dear Anil ji,
      That is so much like Bhaja Govindam isnt it ?

The second and third verses are almost the same...
second one is : ma kuru dhana jana yavvana garvam harati nimeshat kalat sarvam. [do not pride in money, people support and youth, in one twinkling of the eye time may take away everything]
third one is : yavat pavano nivasati dehe , tavat prchati kushalam gehe gatavati vayo dehapaye bharya bibhyati tasmin kaye [as long as you breathe in air, people ask about your wellfare, the moment air or prana leaves this body, even your wife shall fear this body]

infact even the first one seems to be :
ka the kanta, dana gata cinta, vatula kim tava nasti niyanta ?


General topics / Re: What is Self Inquiry ?
« on: October 25, 2017, 02:53:14 PM »
Dear Atmavichar,
              :) That is an never-ending question. Fortunately we do not require an answer for that!

Let me explain this very carefully and systematically, please read this with care...
Please see this ...

When you ask "how does thought originate". what you are asking for is a "cause" for the thought. But then, if we have a cause, we can ask for a cause for it. and this chain of < cause->effect > needs to terminate somewhere and the best way is to leave it at thought -- because trying to associate something else as cause takes us no where and does no better !

We cannot even say Awareness is the cause for Thought because thought is mithya and awareness is SAT [Mandukya Upanishad, Gaudapada karika, alata shanti prakaranam] ... and so the best answer is there is no thought itself and therefore no possibility of its origin.

Please see one important point here ... Vedantic teaching only takes us from where we are and launches us beyond. The teaching itself is only geared towards that. The entire thing is only a negation without anything positive said. I see a kind of stabilty in the world, so the negation process starts by saying thoughts are not stable and so a world built on thoughts as basis cannot be stable.  so when we say thoughts are momentary, we are really talking to a person who sees thoughts as real and dismissing their reality. that negation is the teaching. but when we ask where have they originated , its going the reverse way to establish their presence :D ... which is meaningless endeavor. If you see carefully all creation theories are also negations alone... what IS , cannot and need not be described, because its Self Evident and by itself is the basis of all explanations. So what any vedantic theory states is only a negation. here we are negating the "stability" idea of thought and along with it goes the stability idea of the world. As i said, all creation theories explained in vedanta are actually negations. when i say that the world is made of 5 elements that came together ... i am really saying that we have 5 senses that is the basis of the world that we experience ... that is a negation of the world out there independent of the 5 senses ! this is the meaning in creation theories... thats why in gaudapada karikas we dismiss all creation theories as suited for the mediocre students --- the implication is that those theories only served to negate some ideas and having done that we throw them off... its like a thorn used to remove anotehr thorn and then both are thrown away.


General topics / Re: What is Self Inquiry ?
« on: October 25, 2017, 01:44:20 PM »
Self Inquiry is Not:

1. Intense Activity
2. Killing each thought as it arises [how will i kill a thought that is already dead the moment i recognize it arose ?]
3. killing ego [ego - its not there to be killed]
4. placing attention on heart [hrt is that into which everything dissolves. if you place anything there it dissolves too :) ... so its truely to remain without i]
5. placing attention on I AM [same as 4]

General topics / What is Self Inquiry ?
« on: October 25, 2017, 01:36:30 PM »
The best explanation on Self Inquiry I have ever read comes from Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi's Upadesha Saram where he says :
Manasantu kim, margane krite naiva manasam , marga arjavat...

This is the most direct path... what is it ? to look within as to whence mind [or equivalently I] arises and to discover there is no mind or I!

Self Inquiry is not yet another "doing"... its a means to resolve all doing to Just Be.
Thus, Self Inquiry should make us calm and not Tensed up. It is an instant movement towards effortlessness.

Lets observe this closely. This body of ours is like a room. The awareness is like space within the room and inbetween there are a few thoughts ... thoughts by nature are instantaneous. they come and vanish by themselves. we need not do anything about that. If you do not believe me on this, try to hold onto a thought without changing :) . They change. They pass away. Now ... lets ask an interesting question "Who am I ?"
if i am the body, the body does not have any worries about its aging, it does not have any worries whether ill pass or fail or what others think about me ... all these are not body's worries... thats why bhagavan says "deho na jaanati", the body does not know !
if i am the awareness, Awarenes is a mute spectator ... it does not care for anything. ever silent Self ... it is ever in just be state.

who else is there ? I cannot be a thought either since i see its coming and its going as well ! i live past its death ! so i cannot be the thought. then who is there ? The point here is , there is no one. Thus there is neither bondage nor liberation.

This is Self inquiry. We should not make it into another activity for this fictitious I to engage in. Even when i say "fix the attention on I AM" -- thats really making another activity ... to truely turn attention towards I AM is to dissolve the I in it and remain as I AM, what else can one be, since one is ever that I AM ? To turn attention towards awareness is to withdraw attention from the false I and nothing else.

This is transforming our entire life into meditation. There is nothing to do, no where to go. this is liberation. Bhagavan Ramana puts it beautifully : nashta manasotkrusta yoginah krityam asti kim ? sva stithim yathah ... for the one who has his mind dissolved, what is there to be done but to just remain as one is ? well ... mind is not even dissolved, it never was in the first place ... so this recognition is the dissolution of mind ...


General topics / Re: what is abidance
« on: October 25, 2017, 01:08:47 PM »
Dear Shivam ji,

Self Abidance is your natural state. you are the Self, where else can you abide ?
A person looked into a well and thought that he has fallen into the well. The solution is not to stop the reflection ["I"] from appearing. The solution is the understanding that it is a reflection and that he never fell in the well in the first place.


General topics / Re: What is truth? Who can know?
« on: October 24, 2017, 11:01:59 AM »
Dear Shivam ji,
         :) You have mistaken this knowledge. The knowledge is not about birthlessness or deathlessness of "someone" or "some-soul" !
This knowledge liberates here and now. its not some kind of delayed "hope"... nor is it an escape from suffering.
Immortality of "Self" does not help you either ... because what ever that Self is ... we seem mortal !

The objections you raise are due to wrong knowledge. Some information imagined to be knowledge. True Knowledge liberates here and now and your remaining life becomes a simple joy ride 24 7 ... evry moment. That is the use. It is not the immortality of a "Self" !!

Also Shivam ji, If you experience a kind of comfort when you explain that this is all real ... that is because of acceptance. i can pretty well understand that you do feel some kind of nice-ness or comfort when you say "this is how things are" ... because you "accepted" things as they are... and you feel nice... but the question is ... why does one feel nice when one accepts ?

BTW :D ... how to you know "no body can know beyond this " ? :P


The first verse really questions the cause effect relationship that we feel to be very real in our lives. We have seen that the cause effect relationship in a dream is no more than an imagination and the same thing holds for this life of ours. This is about the first verse, where the attention is shifted to the one who imagines the whole thing up - namely the dreamer.

The second verse goes on to describe the plight of a person who takes this world to be real and tries to achieve something here. The plight of such a person is like that of a person who tries to acquire something substantial by setting a dream world in order. The dream world shall never settle. We try to settle things in the world and then pursue our spiritual endeavors, and if we try this we shall find that this world never settles. We patch it up at one place and it begins to give away at another place. Its been compared to a dilapidated house. These things wont last and its futile to try to make them perfect. Before I can make my worldly life perfect, life itself slips off my hands unnoticed!

In our endless struggle to correct and set the things of the world right, we loose life and with that an opportunity to seek the Truth too ! This does not mean we should neglect the world, rather it means we need to approach the world with certain attitude and clarity that would help us purify our minds and thereby lead us to moksha or liberation !

Lets now proceed to study the second verse of upadesha saram...

General topics / Re: What is truth? Who can know?
« on: October 23, 2017, 03:03:45 PM »
Dear Shivam ji,

I see that there is no bigger truth than the ordinary life and living. There is this body of ours with life, there is birth and there is death, there is this world and real too! The people around us are very real and loving them is very real and when they suffer, it does make us suffer as well! There is pain and pleasure, very real, unlike the spiritual schools which preach and lure you that there is no death no birth, that there is a soul, which you truly are, that there is a self brahman, etc., which needs to be realised etc., that the world is just an illusion - The dream which is sold that there is a realisation upon which you cam transcend all these realities is a dream worth only a dream, actually!

There is no need to discard this "ordinary life" for liberation. But there is definitely a need to observe it more deeply.
A leaf drops off the tree and it becomes humus is that death of leaf or the birth of humus ? where is birth and where is death ?
There is body ?? What you call body is really a process. molecules move in and out of it continuously ... its like a river ... someone said no one can place his feet in the same river twice ! no one can have the same body any two moments of time !

and ..., who suffers ?

Lets look at this ordinary life deeply ... nay , clearly and properly as it is !!
This so called body , its solidarity , feeling of me and mine ... where are they ?
What you call body is only certain sensations , do we see this ?


Cutting the hair makes one mostly unrecognizable :)
that is all the reason. the idea is to get rid of pride in a certain form, in what ever possible way.
get rid of attachments to body and mind !

some people cut the hair completely
some others allow it to grow as it grows.

its just symbolic.

Ajahn Brahm

Ajahn Brahm's talks online are great source material for meditation and related practices..
He has a fantastic book called "The Art of Disappearing". That is a very nice book to possess.

He says meditation is :" being kind, being mindful and making peace"
I found this definition to be very useful.
while youtube is full of his videos which everyone can listen to and enjoy, A guided Meditation session by Ajahn Brahm...


Dear Anil,
       :) Thank you for the welcome and the nice words about my posts. I am doing it slowly due to lack of sufficient time and it also allows me to meditate on the verses a little deeply.

I have been reading some your recent posts and I am really happy to see some nice ideas and conversations flowing in. I would like to add the following comments to this, just in case someone finds them useful.

Self Inquiry is a method to call the bluff off the little-I.
This little-I is really an imposter acting like "me".
bhagavan said, whence does the feeling of "I" arise, please observe and that is like a dog following a scent, or we following a sound to find the source. Lets take a simple example, suppose someone criticizes me and I feel bad. Whence is this feeling that "I am unhappy" arising ? Please observe carefully within. This feeling is not the body's feeling, obviously. deho na janati, the body does not know. This cannot be the Awareness, Self. Because Awareness is ever a mute witness, unconcerned ! and then what else is there here ?

Please see ... There is Awareness, there "is" body [conditionally for now], nothing else is there here other than a few stray thoughts that are discontinuous. But the feeling of unhappiness is not of a discontinuous kind ... its some kind of continuous entity , not stray thoughts ?? when we observe carefully , we see that there is no person out here ... and so what else is there but to just be ? infact there is no other option. The body just is in the lap of the universe ... and the Awareness ever simply IS. so even to say "just be" is redundant. there is no one else here.

This body is like an empty boat!

This is liberated living !

Its beautifully compared to a flute ... the flute is empty within, the holes are the holes inour body [eyes, ears etc] and the wind that blows through it , is blown by the Lord!

Sri Ramakrishna says:
"If one analyses oneself, one doesn't find any such thing as 'I'.  Take an onion, for instance.  First of all you peel off the red outer skin; then you find thick white skins.  Peel these off one after the other, and you won't find anything inside."

This is liberated living here and now, one may wait for ages and own it up or live it here and now ! The choice is ours! The property is already given, we may take ownership after a few years or now! its our choice!


(Verse 1 : Continued ...)

The law of karma is a crude approximation based on a notion of causality. As long as we look from the lense of causality the law of karma appears to be very real. The moment we look deeply into the nature of things , more meditatively and with deeper insights the law of causality itself crumbles and along with it the law of karma crumbles too.

The Sristi-Dristi and Dristi-Sristi Vadas:

There are two approaches to looking at this creation. The first is called Sristi-Dristi vada, the world or creation is there (really out there) and therefore i see it, and the other is called dristi sristi vada : there is nothing out there  , i see whatever is imagined in my mind. These are very important stand points. There is a beautiful explanation about these two standpoints in the book : " yoga vasishta sarah ... Nectar of Supreme Knowledge , by swami Dhireshananda & translated by Swami Sarvadevananda, Ramakrishna mission" [This is a fantastic book, for all interested readers]

Let me quote the relevant portions from the book directly:

The world has a reality that is why it can be seen" - this is the view of aspirants of the lowest competence, who accept the absolute and the relative existence of the world and support the idea of creation and perception [sristi-dristi]. In this doctrine, the world is impermanent, but not unreal"

The world is observed, that is why it is there - this is the doctorine of perception and creation (Dristi-sristi). this is the practice of the aspirant of mediocre competence. According to this doctrine, the apparent existence of the world (pratibaasika) is accepted.

Again there is no world neither it can be Seen - The Brahman alone is there ... this is the doctrine of non-creation, ajata vada in the view of the aspirants of the best competence. In this doctrine even the reality of the apparent existence of the world is not accepted...

Then the book goes on to explain Dristi-Sristi Vada as follows :

According to this doctrine, the waking state is also a dream only. Therefore knowledge can be attained only by discrimination of two states. these two states are dream and deep sleep. Though in Vedanta,, the discrimination os three states is emphasized normmally, yet for the mediocre aspirants of competence, the discrimination between two states is enough.. It is one state (dream and waking) when the various scenes appear on the surface of the mind - this is the blossoming (unmesa) of the mind as it were. Another state of the mind (Deep sleep) when all visible objects are gone, is called the state of winking of mind (nimesa). Both these two states verily come and go. the Self remains undefiled and unchanged in all these conditions. This Self is verily the transcendental reality and nothing else.

Step By Step Guidance For Seekers

The vedantic teaching is a systematic approach to really go beyond and get rid  of all ignorance. So wherever we are, in what ever stage of life, we are  given an advice and a contemplation for that phase of life. It does not say "you should not have a certain feeling", instead it says "if you have such a feeling, this is what you are supposed to do" !! This is the reason why we have so many teachings. Lets see how a student is guided in a step by step fashion:

a) consider a materialist. Such a person looks at the world as totally real. so such a one is first taught the concept of a God who created the world. This is taught systematically and 5 elements etc are discussed.

b) now consider a person who accepts that there is a God who created the world. This person has already stopped treating the world as totally real, because there is God who can interfere and make things different. Such a person knows that if one is in trouble one may pray to God for help. This person is already prepared to see the world as a little unreal ... so such a one is taught the dristi sristi vada to get rid of the notion of reality of world altogether. This person learns to see the world as a dream now.

c) once a person can see the world as dream, its easy for such a one to see that there is no world in reality -- thus leaping into the ajata vada !

Thus a person is systematically lead into ajata vada. God Alone IS.

Linking Karma Phala To Karma : Materialistic View Vs Dristi-Sristi vs Sristi Dristi Views

Now lets see how a materialist links karma phala to karma ? For a pure materialist, the karma and karma phala are linked by laws of physics. There is no non-material object , nothing survives death. This is purely materialistic view.

The karma mimamsakas , for whom this verse introduces knowledge, are little better than pure materialists, because they agree there is a soul that transmigrates the body when we die but then they think there is a slightly modified law of karma that binds karma phala to karma.

The  Sristi Dristi vada would say, God links the karma phala with karma, not just some law. Even if the law is held, who ensures that it holds ? karma is insentient, how can it hold onto the person as he passes from birth to birth ? With this interpretation, the kartuh in the verse 1 is God.

The Dristi-Sristi Vada ,as we already discussed says its only a dream... its only because of our imagination and nothing more! there is no real world, no real doing nor any real result. when i involve in bad karma, the quality of my mind is impure and hence i fail to imagine a good life. when i purify my mind, the quality of my life also improves because all my imaginations improve. This is the position I have taken here for the verse.


Dear Anil,
           :) Hope your physical health has improved now.
Please take care.


Dear ksksat27,
            :) you ask some nice and practical questions. That is really nice. So here is my perspective:

First of all do not worry about this observing "I AM" when just out of bed. I would say forget it - no matter who gave you the suggestion.

Second you can improve your quality of sleep by practicing this guided meditation before going to sleep :
you can also try it twice a day or try a reduced version yourself once you become comfortable. but you should definitely try it just before going to bed. These days i am introducing this to every second person i meet ... my claim is that it is the easiest form of meditation and available for everyone.
[fun question: when i am observing sensations of the body, am i observing the body or the mind ? any further thoughts on observing body ? ]

Thirdly, from vedantic perspective: you still have three states waking, dream and deep sleep. you are simply not aware of the deep sleep state but do not need to worry about it. if a thought is like a wave, there has to be a low between two peaks of the waves. so that gap between thoughts has to be there in dream as well and what is that if it is not deep sleep ?

actually a dream is projected from a deep sleep state. you are seeing this ... then this entire world is dissolved ... and from that dissolution a new world is projected. projection always happens from deep sleep. so you have it.

Finally: Ajahn Brahm says : meditation is about being kind, being gentle and making peace.
We need to always get this point right. Someone said something , and that is fine, but what matters most is what is true for us, not who thinks what.


PS: physical condition is something for doctors to look into. if your frequent urination during nights is due to diabetes  or some physical situation , you need to definitely talk to a doctor and get the required checkups done. please do not ignore.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11